April 9, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; New Orleans Hornets center Chris Kaman (35) reacts during the final seconds of a loss to the Los Angeles Lakers at the New Orleans Arena. The Lakers defeated the Hornets 93-91. Mandatory Credit: Derick E. Hingle-US PRESSWIRE

Jeff Caplan of ESPN Dallas believes the San Antonio Spurs will finish behind the Los Angeles Clippers this season.

Think about that. He believes the Clippers, despite still lacking the depth and defensive continuity necessary to beat the Spurs last year, will indeed win more games than San Antonio.

It’s not completely outlandish, and I’m not slamming Caplan’s opinion, but it seems improbable to put more faith in the Clippers’ below-average defense especially one that allowed 105.7 points per 100 possessions last season.

Aside from that belief, Caplan still maintained his sanity and ranked the Dallas Mavericks behind the Spurs. While the Mavericks were spurned by Deron Williams, their team is much more versatile and potent from the perimeter.

This, and the fact that Chris Kaman is an actual offensive threat, give Caplan reason to believe that the Mavs have a shot against San Antonio.

    “The first thing that comes to mind is that Duncan will have to expend energy on defense like never before     against the Mavs. San Antonio typically has gotten away with Duncan defending the Mavs’ center, who, from     Erick Dampier to DeSagana Diop to Brendan Haywood to Tyson Chandler and back to Haywood, has not     been an offensive threat. So someone other than Duncan has mostly had the privilege of guarding Dirk     Nowitzki.

    “This season if, say, Diaw, draws Dirk, Duncan won’t have the luxury of only casually defending the Mavs’     center. He will now face Chris Kaman, a legitimate back-to-the-basket threat and the most offensively     skilled of the Mavs’ long list of 7-foot centers. From a Mavs defensive standpoint, new point guard Darren     Collison brings needed speed to combat Parker’s penetrations and shooting guard O.J. Mayo and Dahntay     Jones will be better equipped to help defend Ginobili than the options — mainly Shawn Marion — the Mavs     had last season.”

Caplan may have overstated Kaman’s offensive prowess. He’s a much more effective option than Haywood, yes, but that doesn’t make him a legitimate option.

Per MySynergySports, he graded as below-average option in the post, in the pick-and-roll and away from the ball. His mid-range shooting from the perimeter, however, is an asset. He converted on 45% of his attempts from 16-23 feet, a mark only bested by Zaza Pachulia, Marreese Speights and Tim Duncan. It’s undeniable that his addition will be a positive one offensively.

Anything more than that may be too much to ask.

Hat-tip to Kyle Boenitz of Project Spurs.

April 7, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; New Orleans Hornets center Chris Kaman (35) celebrates with shooting guard Eric Gordon (10) during the second half of a game at the New Orleans Arena. The Hornets defeated the Timberwolves 99-90. Mandatory Credit: Derick E. Hingle-US PRESSWIRE

The Spurs are in the running for Chris Kaman according to Ric Bucher of ESPN.com (H/T Paul Garcia of Project Spurs). Kaman appeared in 47 games with New Orleans last season, averaging 13.1 points, 7.7 rebounds and 44.6% shooting from the field.

Kaman, an unrestricted free agent, has legitimate length, standing 7’0″. That kind of size is refreshing for a team that is devoid of conventional big man. He would slide behind Tim Duncan as the backup center position which would shift Tiago Splitter into an awkward position. The Spurs would have to sacrifice a considerable amount of floor spacing if they play Tiago in tandem with either Duncan or Kaman.

Kaman is much like Duncan in the respect that he can step out and score from 18-feet. He converted on 43% of his mid-range shots, which represented nearly half of his shot attempts. His overall efficiency, though, dropped significantly: he posted a 47.8 true shooting percentage, a poor mark for centers.

His defense leaves a lot to be desired though he did block 4.7% of New Orleans’ opponents attempts. He allowed opposing centers to accumulate a 20.0 PER off a 56.2 eFG%. Looking at MySynergySports, Kaman did defend spot-ups well at least, allowing 0.73 points per possession (25th). So there’s that.

I personally don’t like the fit as the power forward position needs more girth than the center position as Edg5 outlined for Pounding the Rock today. Adding Kaman will only make Pop’s rotations more difficult which would neutralize any defensive improvement. A defensive minded 4 remains paramount.