The Lakers’ age concerns put damper in premature championship celebration

Jan. 5, 2011; Phoenix, AZ, USA; Los Angeles Lakers guard (24) Kobe Bryant drives to the basket against Phoenix Suns guard Steve Nash in the first quarter at the US Airways Center. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-US PRESSWIRE

The Los Angeles Lakers are really good and talented which is nice but they are also old and decrepit. While the additions of Steve Nash and Dwight Howard overshadow this fundamental fact, they don’t assuage the possibility of their age eventually stopping their championship dreams right in their tracks.

The San Antonio Spurs have tacitly began the process of instituting younger, long-lasting contributors after it became apparent that they essentially maximized the championship window of Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker.

A younger core could flourish with a steady dose of veteran presence and sustaining success, without exceeding the tax apron, is easier because rookie-scale contracts are a lot more favorable than veteran contracts, which are generally longer in length and require $6-10 million per year.

The Lakers are actively operating against this basic assumption; Andrew Goudelock and Darrius Morris are the only two players to be developed internally, ignoring Kobe Bryant, who was drafted by the New Orleans Hornets. Their opaque infrastructure, created by their four-team heist, will cost $114.96 million according to Basketball Reference.

Ideally, you would like your team to be relatively young to make paying nearly double the salary cap an advantageous solution; because, naturally, younger teams have longer shelf lives, allowing teams to justify immense expenditure. The Lakers, meanwhile, aren’t just old but historically old; when you adjust for minutes, which is a more reliable indicator of age, their aggregate total of 31.5 is only bested by the 2001 Utah Jazz, who finished fourth in the Western Conference.

The Spurs, while I don’t have the official numbers, average adjusted age last season was around the 27-28 age and will likely settle into that range even though allocating Richard Jefferson’s minutes to Kawhi Leonard stands to lower the number a bit. That is nearly four years younger — a significant margin that shouldn’t be overlooked.

Their vaunted Big Four — Dwight Howard is the only player south of 30 and his injury concerns are the most pressing, making his seemingly indomitable frame obsolescent without the proper rehabilitation, which may take until Christmas — will garner upwards of 50% of their minutes this season. That’s a good thing because they are good but also bad; their lack of fledgling, transient, bursts of energy lower Los Angeles’ margin for error.

Experience is nice and, in fact, it’s been proven that it matters albeit not as much as, you know, talent. Younger players shouldn’t be a substitute for veterans, as they aren’t as deft at winning games, but they are an effective preemptive strike against the consequences of age.

Those consequences may affect the Lakers more than anything.

Hat-tip to Aaron McGuire of Gothic Ginobili for the methodology and estimates. McGuire is currently in the process of working on his 370 part player capsule series, a task that requires him to write about every player in the NBA. His capsule on Tim Duncan, especially, was awesome. Check them out.

Topics: Dwight Howard, Kobe Bryant, Los Angeles Lakers, Steve Nash

Want more from Air Alamo?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • rudy tesoro

    Comparisons are almost always made between the Spurs vis a vis other teams focusing on weak points. Comparison such as age is highlighted. Take this article comparing the Lakers and the Spurs. It says the Lakers are older than the Spurs. How did it arrive at this conclusion? Bryant, Nash and Jamison are the only players of consequence considered forgetting that the Spurs’ TD, TP and Manu are older, without weighing in Bonner, Jackson and Diaw.

    • Quixem

      Actually, McGuire took the liberty of estimating the 2013 Lakers rotation and finding an accurate age total given their likely distribution of minutes. It’s a legitimate number. My estimate wasn’t as concrete as his but the Spurs are indeed younger than the Lakers. This isn’t something I merely made up out of thin air.

    • Quixem

      Also: Check his tweet near the end of the piece. Spells it all.